China Agritech's Positive Implications For Plaintiffs

By Serena Hallowell, David Goldsmith​​​​​​​, Philip Leggio and Anna Menkova ( July 3, 2018, 4:58 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court determined in American Pipe[1] and Crown Cork[2] that the filing of a class action will toll the applicable statute of limitations to allow putative class members to intervene or bring individual claims. A number of questions have been raised in recent years regarding the scope of these decisions, including whether American Pipe's tolling rule applies to successive "piggyback" class actions. The Supreme Court recently concluded in China Agritech Inc. v. Resh[3] that it does not. Although the ruling may impose new stumbling blocks for class actions under certain circumstances, there are things that plaintiffs can do to mitigate such complications to ensure that their right to recovery is not extinguished....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!