SEC's Lax Crypto Settlement Marks Unexplained Policy Shift

By Robert Rosenblum, Amy Caiazza, Taylor Evenson and Katherine Mann ( October 17, 2019, 3:12 PM EDT) -- Until Sept. 30, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement actions in the crypto industry conveyed a consistent message: Most cryptocurrency is a security, and if a token issuer does not follow the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the issuer would face significant consequences in the form of substantial penalties, a mandated rescission offer to U.S. investors, a requirement to register the tokens under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and bad actor disqualifications preventing the issuer from future Regulation A and Regulation D offerings.[1] ...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!