Extraterritoriality: The ATS In Focus

After RJR, the Debate Over the 'Focus' Test Is Over

Law360, New York ( October 25, 2016, 10:25 AM EDT) -- Perlette Jura Dylan Mefford In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court's transnational jurisprudence has dramatically impacted cross-border litigation, particularly lawsuits arising under the Alien Tort Statute. Daimler narrowed broad concepts of personal jurisdiction and Kiobel made clear that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies in ATS cases.[1] Now, the court's recent decision in RJR Nabisco Inc. v. European Community has finally put to rest the debate about whether Morrison's "focus" test applies to the question of extraterritoriality in ATS cases.[2] RJR confirms that, in determining whether the application of a statute is impermissibly extraterritorial, courts must look to the statute's "focus."[3] This ruling displaces decisions from other courts, which held that Kiobel did not adopt the "focus" test for ATS cases....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!