By Samuel Miller ( October 5, 2018, 12:25 PM EDT) -- This term, the U. S. Supreme Court will consider whether iPhone owners who purchased apps from the Apple app store can proceed with a federal antitrust claim arguing that Apple has illegally monopolized the market for iPhone apps. The case is Apple Inc. v. Pepper (In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation). [1] The issue is whether iPhone owners who purchase apps from Apple's app store, and who paid Apple for the purchase should be considered "direct purchasers" within the meaning of Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois,[2] which holds that only "direct purchasers" from an antitrust defendant are entitled to sue for treble damages under the federal antitrust laws. . . .
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
Law firms are actively looking for ways to incorporate artificial intelligence into their workflow as it becomes ever more common. More than half of surveyed attorneys at U.S. law firms use generative AI for some purpose — up significantly from less than a third of attorneys who participated in the Law360 Pulse AI Survey last year.