Law360 is providing free access to its coronavirus coverage to make sure all members of the legal community have accurate information in this time of uncertainty and change. Use the form below to sign up for any of our weekly newsletters. Signing up for any of our section newsletters will opt you in to the weekly Coronavirus briefing.
Sign up for our Technology newsletter
You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:
Thank You!
Law360 (August 11, 2020, 3:54 PM EDT ) In the country's first in-person jury trial over patents since the COVID-19 pandemic led to nationwide court closures, a Texas federal jury on Tuesday said Apple should pay PanOptis and related companies more than $506 million for willfully infringing patents covering 4G LTE technology.
An Eastern District of Texas jury said Apple willfully infringed patents related to 4G LTE in a dispute over the use of the technology in the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)
"We thank the jury for their time but are disappointed with the verdict and plan to appeal," Apple said in a statement. "Lawsuits like this by companies who accumulate patents simply to harass the industry only serve to stifle innovation and harm consumers."
Corporate representatives for PanOptis and attorneys for both sides didn't immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Optis Wireless Technology LLC, PanOptis Patent Management LLC, Unwired Planet LLC and other related companies had accused Apple of infringing five patents by offering 4G LTE capability on the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch. PanOptis has said it tried to get Apple to take a license, but that Apple didn't make a good-faith effort to negotiate.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap oversaw the seven-day trial, which he'd cleared despite Apple's protests that it was still unsafe to proceed during the coronavirus outbreak. The judge had said the court was mitigating the public health risk by sanitizing facilities daily, and requiring face shields, temperature checks and a restricted number of attorneys seated at counsel table. He also allowed some witnesses to testify from Europe over video.
"The task of balancing very real public health concerns against the right of the parties to resolve their far-reaching disputes is a challenge this court has not sought and does not relish," the judge had said in July. "However, as Robert Frost admonished in A Servant to Servants, 'the best way out is always through.'"
PanOptis had been in a similar patent fight with Huawei, which ended in a post-trial settlement in February after a $13.2 million judgment in PanOptis' favor.
The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,019,332; 8,385,284; 8,411,557; 9,001,774; and 8,102,833.
PanOptis is represented by Samuel Baxter, Jennifer Truelove and Steven Pollinger of McKool Smith PC, Jason Sheasby, Annita Zhong, Lisa Glasser, Maclain Wells, Ingrid Petersen, Kelsey Schuetz, Andrew Strabone, Rebecca Carson, Elliot Chen and Dennis Courtney of Irell & Manella LLP, and Jill Bindler of Gray Reed & McGraw LLP.
Apple is represented by Joseph J. Mueller, Mark Selwyn, Mindy Sooter, Timothy Syrett and Brittany Blueitt Amadi of WilmerHale and Melissa Smith of Gillam & Smith LLP.
The case is Optis Wireless Technology LLC et al. v. Apple Inc., case number 2:19-cv-00066, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
--Additional reporting by Tiffany Hu. Editing by Amy Rowe.
For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.
