Take Extra Steps When Social Media Page Is Evidence

Law360, New York ( October 10, 2014, 10:12 AM EDT) -- Courts are increasingly addressing questions regarding the proper methods and support to authenticate electronic evidence. In an opinion dated Sept. 24, 2014, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that incriminating instant messages sent under a false name were sufficiently authenticated by the recipient's trial testimony of "confirming circumstances" tying the electronic confession to the defendant. [1] On Oct. 3, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in United States of America v. Zhyltsou, vacating a conviction because the trial court improperly admitted evidence from a social media page that the federal government tied to the defendant without sufficient proof of its authenticity. [2] Both appellate rulings instruct that a proponent must not overlook or presume the necessary foundational proof to authenticate electronic evidence. . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

This past year, a handful of attorneys secured billions of dollars in settlements and judgments for both classes and individual plaintiffs against massive companies and organizations like Facebook, Dell, the National Association of Realtors, Johnson & Johnson, UFC and Credit Suisse, earning them recognition as Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar for 2025.