Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Desoto Cab Company, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:16-cv-06385
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 21, 2016
Uber Seeks Dismissal Of SF Predatory Pricing Suit
Uber Technologies Inc. asked a California federal court to dismiss it from an antitrust suit on Tuesday, saying that DeSoto Cab Co. has not properly alleged federal predatory pricing claims in the case accusing the ride-hailing company of losing money on UberX rides in a bid to drive out all competition before raising prices.
-
November 02, 2016
SF Cab Co. Says Uber Driving Out Competition With Fares
Uber Technologies Inc. is losing money on every UberX ride by steeply undercutting its competitors in an effort to push them all out of the market, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in California federal court.