Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
4:20-cv-05640
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Arnold & Porter
- Bartko LLP
- Cahill Gordon
- Cravath Swaine
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Faegre Drinker
- Fenwick & West
- Fox Rothschild
- Gibson Dunn
- Hagens Berman
- Holtzman Vogel
- Hueston Hennigan
- Huth Reynolds
- Kressin Meador
- Kwun Bhansali
- Massumi & Consoli
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Mitchell Silberberg
- Munger Tolles
- Norton Rose
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Weiss
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Turner Boyd
- Walker Stevens
- Weil Gotshal
- Wiggin & Dana
- Willkie Farr
- Wilson Sonsini
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Digital Content Next
- Epic Games Inc.
- Google LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Netflix Inc.
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- NVIDIA Corp.
- Paypal Holdings Inc.
- Roblox Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Valve Corp.
- Visa Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 17, 2025
Epic Wary Of Apple's Privilege Claims As Doc Review Wraps
Epic Games' counsel took issue with the rising number of privilege assertions Apple is maintaining over its discovery documents in their ongoing antitrust compliance fight, telling a magistrate judge Friday he's "frankly surprised and concerned" by the sudden increase as Apple's privilege-assertion rereview draws to a close.
-
January 14, 2025
'Totally A Tactic': Judge Rips Apple For Discovery Delays
The California federal judge presiding over Epic Games' antitrust compliance fight with Apple criticized the tech giant's efforts to withhold tens of thousands of documents under attorney-client privilege, telling Apple's counsel at a hearing Tuesday that "in large part, this is delay ... it's totally a tactic" and "there will be consequences."
-
January 03, 2025
Epic Slams Apple's 'Deeply Disturbing' Doc Review Delays
Epic Games Inc.'s counsel expressed shock Friday that Apple has only rereviewed 21,000 of more than 50,000 documents Apple claims are attorney-client privileged in their antitrust fight, telling a California magistrate judge during a hearing the number is "deeply disturbing" and "very low."
-
January 01, 2025
California Cases To Watch In 2025
Legal experts following Golden State courts in 2025 are tracking high-stakes antitrust and personal injury cases against Big Tech companies along with NFL subscribers' $4.7 billion antitrust appeal, as well as IP litigation against artificial intelligence developers and precedent-setting cases that will likely clarify environmental laws and the repercussions of unpaid arbitrateon fees.
-
December 17, 2024
Apple Fights Epic's Atty Privilege Challenge Win Over Docs
Apple has asked a California federal judge to overturn a magistrate judge and allow it to withhold documents in a discovery spat with Epic Games, arguing Monday the documents in the antitrust case aren't simply business analyses but rather, reflect "'legal advice on a business decision,' which is protected."
-
December 13, 2024
Apple Can't Drag Out Privilege Claims Re-Review, Judge Says
A California federal magistrate judge on Friday rejected Apple's argument that Apple and Epic Games should agree on a document-review protocol before Apple re-reviews 57,000 documents it claims are attorney-client privileged in their antitrust fight, telling Apple's counsel such a process would likely drag out litigation without being useful.
-
December 05, 2024
Apple To Appeal Epic's Atty-Client Privilege Challenge Win
Apple and Epic Games told a California federal judge Thursday that they've agreed on a protocol for a special master to re-review 57,000 documents that Apple claims are attorney-client privileged in their antitrust fight, while Apple added that it plans to appeal his finding that its privilege assertions over a sample were overbroad.
-
December 03, 2024
Antitrust Judge Rips Apple's 'Meritless' Doc Privilege Claims
Apple fought uphill Tuesday to convince a California federal magistrate judge that it properly withheld 57,000 documents from Epic Games due to attorney-client privilege in their antitrust fight, with the judge eventually telling its lawyer, "I disagree with everything you're saying, and the fact you're making these meritless arguments causes me concern."
-
November 08, 2024
Apple's Cited Rulings Just Cement Old Precedent, Epic Says
What Apple contends are new rulings from a California appeals court and the U.S. Supreme Court are really just affirmations of existing precedent that change nothing about the injunction blocking the iPhone maker's rules against steering users to alternative payment systems, Epic Games has told a California federal judge.
-
October 28, 2024
Apple Withholding Docs In Monopoly Row, Epic Says
Epic Games and Apple continued on in a discovery dispute in Epic's suit accusing Apple of monopolizing the iOS app distribution and in-app payment processing markets, with the video game company saying in a joint letter filed Friday that Apple is withholding "tens of thousands" of responsive documents.