Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
Case Number:
2:22-cv-00184
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Constitutional - State Statute
Judge:
Firms
- Agricola Law
- Badham & Buck
- Bainbridge Mims
- Balch & Bingham
- Boyden Gray
- Cooper & Kirk
- Copeland Franco
- Covington & Burling
- Dominick Feld
- Farella Braun
- Jenner & Block
- Jones Day
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lightfoot Franklin
- Phelps Dunbar
- Quinn Emanuel
- Shook Hardy
- Wallace Jordan
- Wilkerson & Bryan
Companies
- American Academy of Family Physicians
- American Academy of Pediatrics
- American College of Physicians
- American Family Association
- American Medical Association Inc.
- American Psychiatric Association
- Americans United for Life
- Association of American Medical Colleges
- Judicial Watch Inc.
- Texas Public Policy Foundation
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 06, 2024
Alabama Calls Its Gender Care Law A Rational Policy Choice
Alabama lawmakers acted out of a desire to protect children — not discriminatory intent — when they passed legislation that restricted gender-affirming care for minors, easily clearing the legal standard required to uphold the law, the state has told a federal judge.
-
July 03, 2024
Contentious Ala. Gender Care Case Partly Paused
Favoring "judicial efficiency," an Alabama federal court has partially granted the Biden administration's opposed motion to stay a case challenging the state's ban on gender-affirming healthcare for transgender youth while the U.S. Supreme Court reviews a similar Tennessee ban, though some briefing, including for summary judgment, was permitted to proceed.
-
June 25, 2024
Gov't Asks Ala. Fed. Court To Stay Gender Care Case
The Biden administration has asked an Alabama federal court to stay a suit challenging a state law criminalizing gender-affirming care for transgender youth, which has drawn attention because of judge-shopping allegations leveled against plaintiff's counsel, as the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a separate but potentially precedential suit.
-
June 21, 2024
Attys Accused Of Judge Shopping Must Share Public Remarks
Attorneys accused of judge shopping two 2022 suits challenging an Alabama law criminalizing some gender-affirming care for transgender youths have been given 48 hours to turn over any public statements, releases or other information they or their organizations have shared about the disciplinary proceedings, just days ahead of a Monday hearing.
-
June 20, 2024
Attys Accused Of Judge Shopping Rebut Fraud Allegations
An Alabama federal judge is conducting an in-camera review of a long-awaited "Q&A document" believed to have circulated among attorneys accused of judge shopping their efforts to fight a 2022 state law preventing transgender youth from accessing gender-affirming care, with the lawyers handing over the document but denying allegations of misconduct.
-
June 17, 2024
Attys Accused Of Judge Shopping Must Turn Over Q&A Doc
Attorneys accused of a coordinated effort to "judge shop" amid federal suits challenging an Alabama law banning certain medical procedures for transgender youth must supply a document the court believes displays the attorneys' preparations for a panel hearing in which one of the attorneys allegedly committed perjury.
-
May 21, 2024
Judge Shopping Row, Henrietta Lacks And SC Abortion Clock
BigLaw lawyers get deeper into sanction spat, a case over profits from harvested cancer cells, and a Texas Supreme Court decision in a Fen-Phen malpractice suit. Law360 Healthcare Authority looks at those and other developments from the week in healthcare litigation.
-
May 14, 2024
BigLaw Attys Fight Sanctions Over Alleged Judge Shopping
Attorneys from Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP, Cooley LLP, Lightfoot Franklin & White LLC and prominent LGBTQ rights organizations did not engage in judge shopping when walking away from cases challenging an Alabama law banning certain medical procedures for transgender youth, the lawyers have told an Alabama federal court.
-
March 20, 2024
Trans Kids' Attys May Face Sanctions Over Ala. Judges' Probe
Eleven attorneys, including lawyers from Cooley LLP, Lightfoot Franklin & White LLC and prominent LGBTQ rights organizations, have been ordered to show why they should not be sanctioned after a judicial report concluded they engaged in judge-shopping when challenging an Alabama law banning certain medical procedures for transgender youth, according to a newly unsealed order.
-
September 22, 2023
Access To Justice Cases To Watch This Term
In the term beginning next week, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to return to some of the most hot-button issues concerning civil rights: guns, free speech, race discrimination, and potentially more.