Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:07-md-01827
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Taylor & Patchen
- Schubert Jonckheer
- Seeger Weiss
- Davis Polk
- Murphy Pearson
- Black Slaughter
- Lewis Brisbois
- Sherrard Roe
- Fillmore Spencer
- KTBS Law
- Stebner Gertler
- Farmer Brownstein
- SL Environmental Law Group
- Girardi & Keese
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Cohen Milstein
- Carey Danis
- Shub & Johns
- Bass Berry
- Foreman & Brasso
- Stris & Maher
- Freed Kanner
- Skaggs Faucette
- Buchalter APC
- Smith Dollar
- SSL Law Firm
- Steven Williams Law
- Carr McClellan
- Yenson Lynn
- Towe Ball
- Covington & Burling
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Steptoe LLP
- Bilzin Sumberg
- K&L Gates
- Sperling & Slater
- Hirschfeld Kraemer
- Gross & Belsky
- Andrus Anderson
- Morrison Frost
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Cohn Lifland
- Tousley Brain
- Law Offices of Jon T. King
- Alston & Bird
- Frankovitch Anetakis
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Freedman Boyd
- Girard Sharp
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Steyer Lowenthal
- McManis Faulkner
- Cera LLP
- Greenspoon Marder
- Finnegan
- Weil Gotshal
- Baker McKenzie
- McCune Wright
- Eimer Stahl
- Michaels Ward
- Stranch Jennings
- Willenken LLP
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Benesch
- Musick Peeler
- Munger Tolles
- Orrick Herrington
- Mallison & Martinez
- Sommers Schwartz
- Nossaman LLP
- Aylstock Witkin
- Green & Noblin PC
- Bryan Cave
- Lite DePalma
- Ellis George
- Coffman Law Firm
- Diamond McCarthy
- Melton Law Firm PLLC
- Guerrieri Clayman
- Dechert LLP
- Badgley Mullins
- McKool Smith
- Methvin Terrell
- Bandas Law Firm
- Haglund Kelley
- Neal & Harwell
- Harder Mirell
- Kaplan Fox
- Paul Weiss
- McCallister Law Group
- Spector Roseman
- Sheppard Mullin
- Berger Montague
- Cooper & Kirkham
- Heins Mills
- Miller Shah LLP
- Berry Silberberg
- Cook Collection Attorneys
- Herum Crabtree
- Farella Braun
- Hadsell Stormer
- Lieff Cabraser
- Bartlit Beck
- Pritzker Levine
- Ogletree Deakins
- MoginRubin
- Baker & Hostetler
- Kreft Law
- Kralowec Law
- Nixon Peabody
- Lowther Johnson
- Hausfeld LLP
- Lockridge Grindal
- WilmerHale
- Winston & Strawn
- Polsinelli PC
- Riordan & Horgan
- Baute Crochetiere
- Keller Rohrback
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Gilman Law LLP
- Strom Law Firm
- Friedman Kaplan
- Morrison Foerster
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Duane Morris
- Morgan Lewis
- Minami Tamaki
- Manfred APC
- Robins Kaplan
- Zelle LLP
- A&O Shearman
- Lathrop GPM
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- LaMarca Law Group
- McGowan Hood
- Kirby McInerney
- Berman Tabacco
- Bird Marella
- Ehrlich & Craig
- Sidley Austin
- RJM Litigation Group
- Albright Stoddard
- Duncan Firm
- Atkinson Andelson
- Larson LLP
- Proskauer Rose
- Alioto Law Firm
- BoiesBattin
- Derek G. Howard Law Firm
- Boies Schiller
- Gullett Sanford
- Jenkins Mulligan
- Pearson Warshaw
- Cooley LLP
- Nussbaum Law Group
- O'Neil Cannon
- Bartko LLP
- Gibson Dunn
- Brown Rudnick
- Perkins Coie
- Emerson Firm
- Hagens Berman
- Spiegel Liao
- Gustafson Gluek
- Goodwin Procter
- Carlton Fields
- Bingham McCutchen
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- Nedeau Law Firm
- Hillis Clark
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Law Offices of Francis O. Scarpulla
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Cafferty Clobes
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- SulmeyerKupetz
- Lanak & Hanna
- Trump Alioto
- Nuti Hart
- Cotchett Pitre
- Paul Hastings
- Shook Hardy
- Crowell & Moring
- Alderson Alderson
- Jones Day
- Taus Cebulash
- Taylor and Patchen
- Vinson & Elkins
- Ferguson Chambers
- Lovell Stewart
- Bangs McCullen
- Law Office of Jonathan E. Fortman
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- Joshua R. Furman Law
- Wites Law Firm
- Wyatt & Blake
- Kirkpatrick & Goldsborough
- Klein Hockel
- Zimmerman Reed
- Susman Godfrey
- Glancy Prongay
- Damrell Nelson
- Fisch Sigler
- Jenner & Block
- Johnson Becker
- Glassman Wyatt
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Labaton Keller
- Hellmuth & Johnson
- Herbert Smith Freehills
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Saveri & Saveri
- Latham & Watkins
- White & Case
Companies
- Dell Technologies Inc.
- CA Technologies
- Kmart Corp.
- ViewSonic Corp.
- P.C. Richard & Son Inc.
- Chimei Innolux Corp.
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
- Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
- Sony Group Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Costco Wholesale Corp.
- Hitachi Ltd.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Rockwell Automation Inc.
- Tech Data Corp.
- The Home Depot Inc.
- Toshiba Corp.
- RadioShack Corporation
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Target Corp.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- Magnolia Audio Video
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Eastman Kodak Co.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- AU Optronics Corp.
- The ODP Corp.
- EE Ltd.
- MetroPCS Wireless Inc.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Newegg Inc.
- Renesas Electronics Corp.
- ePlus Inc.
- Nokia Corp.
- NEC Corp.
- Panasonic Corp.
- Sharp Corp.
- Sears Holdings Corp.
- Signify N.V.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 06, 2012
Toshiba Says ATM Fee Ruling Dooms LCD Antitrust Claims
Toshiba Corp. became the latest electronics component maker Thursday to raise the Ninth Circuit's recent ATM fee antitrust litigation ruling to try to nix claims from companies that bought finished products incorporating allegedly price-fixed parts, arguing the plaintiffs don't have standing to seek damages.
-
July 26, 2012
LCD Buyers Say Toshiba Owes $87M Despite Paid-Up Award
A class of liquid crystal display buyers pushed Wednesday to protect its $87 million price-fixing verdict against Toshiba Corp., arguing that the electronics maker hadn't proved it could use the $443 million other defendants have already paid in settlements to offset the entire jury award.
-
July 23, 2012
LCD Makers Cite ATM Case In Bid To Nix Price-Fixing Claims
A group of liquid crystal display makers on Friday cited a recent Ninth Circuit ATM fee antitrust ruling in an attempt to nix price-fixing claims launched by Target Corp., AT&T Corp. and others, arguing that the decision bars the plaintiffs from bringing federal claims based on finished product purchases.
-
July 12, 2012
Toshiba Seeks To Avoid Damages On $87M LCD Verdict
Toshiba Corp. moved Wednesday to avoid paying damages after a class of direct purchasers of liquid crystal displays won an $87 million price-fixing verdict against the company, arguing that the $443 million the plaintiffs already won from other defendants should offset the jury award.
-
July 11, 2012
AUO, LG, Toshiba To Pay $571M In LCD Antitrust MDL
AU Optronics Corp., LG Display America Inc. and Toshiba Corp. have agreed to hand over $571 million to indirect purchasers who claimed the companies fixed the prices of flat-screen panels, an attorney for the screen purchasers said Wednesday.
-
July 09, 2012
Sharp To Pay Dell, Others $200M In LCD Price-Fixing MDL
Sharp Corp. reportedly said Monday that it will pay nearly $200 million to settle a dispute with Dell Inc. and two unnamed companies in California multidistrict litigation accusing it of fixing prices for liquid crystal display screens.
-
June 28, 2012
Toshiba, LCD Purchasers Close Cases In Cartel Trial
Arguments in the direct purchaser class action alleging that Toshiba Corp. conspired to fix prices on liquid crystal display screens came to a close in California federal court on Thursday, sending the case to a jury more than a month after the trial started.
-
June 25, 2012
Costco's LCD Cartel Suit Overreaches, Electronics Cos. Say
Several companies accused of fixing prices of liquid crystal display screens told a California federal court on Friday that Costco Wholesale Corp. had no basis to bring claims based on its indirect purchases from electronics makers that aren't defendants or alleged co-conspirators.
-
June 20, 2012
Toshiba Denies Ties To LCD Price-Fixing Plot
Toshiba Corp. told a California federal court Wednesday that a direct-purchaser class has not presented enough evidence to back claims that the company participated in a seven-year conspiracy to fix prices on liquid crystal display screens.
-
May 17, 2012
Miss. Says $540M LCD Price-Fixing Deal Leaves It In Lurch
The state of Mississippi on Wednesday asked a California federal judge to modify a proposed $539 million settlement in multidistrict litigation involving allegations of price-fixing by major electronics manufacturers, claiming the settlement impermissibly bars ongoing litigation in state court.