Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:07-md-01827
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Albright Stoddard
- Alderson Alderson
- Alioto Law Firm
- Alston & Bird
- Andrus Anderson
- Atkinson Andelson
- Aylstock Witkin
- Badgley Mullins
- Baker & Hostetler
- Baker McKenzie
- Bandas Law Firm
- Bangs McCullen
- Bartlit Beck
- Bass Berry
- Baute Crochetiere
- Benesch
- Berger Montague
- Berman Tabacco
- Berry Silberberg
- Bilzin Sumberg
- Bingham McCutchen
- Bird Marella
- Black Slaughter
- BoiesBattin
- Boies Schiller
- Brown Rudnick
- Bryan Cave
- Buchalter APC
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- Cafferty Clobes
- Carey Danis
- Carlton Fields
- Carr McClellan
- Cera LLP
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Coffman Law Firm
- Cohen Milstein
- Cohn Lifland
- Cook Collection Attorneys
- Cooley LLP
- Cooper & Kirkham
- Cotchett Pitre
- Covington & Burling
- Crowell & Moring
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Damrell Nelson
- Davis Polk
- Dechert LLP
- Derek G. Howard Law Firm
- Diamond McCarthy
- Duane Morris
- Ehrlich & Craig
- Eimer Stahl
- Ellis George
- Emerson Firm
- Farella Braun
- Farmer Brownstein
- Ferguson Chambers
- Fillmore Spencer
- Fisch Sigler
- Foreman & Brasso
- Frankovitch Anetakis
- Freed Kanner
- Freedman Boyd
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Friedman Kaplan
- Gibson Dunn
- Gilman Law LLP
- Girardi & Keese
- Girard Sharp
- Glancy Prongay
- Glassman Wyatt
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Goodwin Procter
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Green & Noblin PC
- Greenspoon Marder
- Gross & Belsky
- Guerrieri Clayman
- Gullett Sanford
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hadsell Stormer
- Hagens Berman
- Haglund Kelley
- Harder Mirell
- Hausfeld LLP
- Heins Mills
- Hellmuth & Johnson
- Herbert Smith Freehills
- Herum Crabtree
- Hillis Clark
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Hirschfeld Kraemer
- Jenner & Block
- Johnson Becker
- Jones Day
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kaplan Fox
- Keller Rohrback
- Kirby McInerney
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Kirkpatrick & Goldsborough
- Klein Hockel
- K&L Gates
- Kralowec Law
- Kreft Law
- KTBS Law
- Labaton Keller
- LaMarca Law Group
- Lanak & Hanna
- Larson LLP
- Latham & Watkins
- Lathrop GPM
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- Law Office of Jonathan E. Fortman
- Law Offices of Francis O. Scarpulla
- Law Offices of Jon T. King
- Lewis Brisbois
- Lieff Cabraser
- Lite DePalma
- Lockridge Grindal
- Lovell Stewart
- Lowther Johnson
- Mallison & Martinez
- Manfred APC
- McCallister Law Group
- McCune Wright
- McGowan Hood
- McKool Smith
- McManis Faulkner
- Melton Law Firm PLLC
- Methvin Terrell
- Michaels Ward
- Miller Shah LLP
- Minami Tamaki
- MoginRubin
- Morgan Lewis
- Morrison Foerster
- Morrison Frost
- Munger Tolles
- Murphy Pearson
- Musick Peeler
- Neal & Harwell
- Nedeau Law Firm
- Nixon Peabody
- Nossaman LLP
- Nuti Hart
- Ogletree Deakins
- O'Neil Cannon
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Hastings
- Paul Weiss
- Pearson Warshaw
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Polsinelli PC
- Pritzker Levine
- Proskauer Rose
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Riordan & Horgan
- RJM Litigation Group
- Robins Kaplan
- Saveri & Saveri
- Schubert Jonckheer
- Seeger Weiss
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sherrard Roe
- Shook Hardy
- Shub & Johns
- Sidley Austin
- Skaggs Faucette
- SL Environmental Law Group
- Smith Dollar
- Sommers Schwartz
- Spector Roseman
- Sperling & Slater
- Spiegel Liao
- SSL Law Firm
- Stebner Gertler
- Steptoe LLP
- Steven Williams Law
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Stris & Maher
- Strom Law Firm
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- SulmeyerKupetz
- Susman Godfrey
- Taus Cebulash
- Taylor and Patchen
- Taylor & Patchen
- Tousley Brain
- Towe Ball
- Trump Alioto
- Vinson & Elkins
- Weil Gotshal
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- White & Case
- Willenken LLP
- WilmerHale
- Winston & Strawn
- Wites Law Firm
- Wyatt & Blake
- Yenson Lynn
- Zelle LLP
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
- Apple Inc.
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- CA Technologies
- Chimei Innolux Corp.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Costco Wholesale Corp.
- Dell Technologies Inc.
- Eastman Kodak Co.
- ePlus Inc.
- Hitachi Ltd.
- Kmart Corp.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- Magnolia Audio Video
- MetroPCS Wireless Inc.
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
- Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
- NEC Corp.
- Newegg Inc.
- Nokia Corp.
- Panasonic Corp.
- RadioShack Corporation
- Renesas Electronics Corp.
- Rockwell Automation Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sears Holdings Corp.
- Sharp Corp.
- Signify N.V.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Target Corp.
- Tech Data Corp.
- The Home Depot Inc.
- The ODP Corp.
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Toshiba Corp.
- ViewSonic Corp.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 16, 2012
2 LG Employees Can't Testify In LCD Price-Fixing Trial
Toshiba Corp. convinced a California federal judge Tuesday to block two LG Display Co. Ltd. employees from testifying for direct purchasers in the upcoming liquid crystal display price-fixing trial, but failed to win permission to use testimony presented in the AU Optronics Corp. criminal case.
-
April 30, 2012
LG Display Settles With 8 States, Consumers In LCD MDL
LG Display Co. Ltd. has become the last company to settle with a class of indirect purchasers in California multidistrict litigation accusing it of fixing prices for liquid crystal display screens, it said in a regulatory filing Monday that also announced a settlement with eight states.
-
April 25, 2012
AUO, Toshiba Settle Consumer Claims In LCD MDL
AU Optronics Corp. and Toshiba Corp. have reached settlements with the indirect purchasers accusing them of fixing prices for liquid crystal display screens, remaining defendant LG Display Co. Ltd. said in a filing Wednesday reviving a dispute over how to structure the class action trial.
-
April 20, 2012
LCD Price-Fixing Trial Gets Split In Two
A California judge ruled Friday to split price-fixing litigation against AU Optronics Corp., LG Display Co. Ltd. and Toshiba Corp. into two stages, over the objections of the consumer plaintiffs and the three liquid crystal display makers.
-
April 19, 2012
LCD Makers, Consumers Oppose Split Trial In Price-Fixing MDL
Both the defendants and consumer plaintiffs in the liquid crystal display price-fixing litigation lambasted a new attempt from direct purchaser plaintiffs to break the trial into two parts, with the manufacturers calling the latest request Wednesday "even more unworkable" than the first plan.
-
April 16, 2012
Plaintiffs Make 2nd Bid To Split LCD Price-Fixing Trial
Direct purchasers on Friday moved to divide an upcoming trial against liquid-crystal display manufacturers including Toshiba Corp. and LG Display Co. Ltd. over alleged price-fixing, arguing that federal and state antitrust claims in the multidistrict litigation should be dealt with separately.
-
April 02, 2012
Sony Hurls New Cartel Claims At Hitachi, Toshiba In MDL
A pair of Sony Corp. units on Monday accused Hitachi Ltd. and Toshiba Corp. of forcing Sony to pay inflated prices for liquid crystal display panels by participating in an alleged cartel that so far has roped several industry players into the California multidistrict litigation.
-
March 22, 2012
Request For 2 Trials Shot Down In LCD Price-Fixing MDL
A California federal judge on Wednesday refused to separate the long-running price-fixing case against a group of liquid crystal display makers into two trials, despite plaintiffs' arguments that doing so would simplify the case and would be less likely to confuse jurors.
-
March 21, 2012
Indirect Buyers Fight For Foreign Evidence In LCD MDL
With an April trial date fast approaching, an indirect purchaser class accusing liquid-crystal display makers of fixing prices fought back Tuesday against efforts from Toshiba Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. to keep jurors from seeing evidence about foreign conduct and antitrust investigations.
-
March 09, 2012
LCD Consumers Worry Joint Trial Will Confuse Jury
Consumers suing liquid-crystal display manufacturers for price-fixing are worried that trying their case together with direct purchasers would confuse jurors with conflicting evidence about how much of the overcharge was passed on, and asked a California federal judge Thursday to split the litigation into two trials.