Chen-Oster et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC. et al

  1. October 13, 2015

    Women Suing Goldman Say Ex-Worker Can Seek Bias Ban

    A proposed class of women suing Goldman Sachs Group Inc. for gender bias urged a New York federal court on Monday to reject the bank's bid to ax an ex-worker's move to bar company practices alleged to favor male employees, blasting Goldman's arguments that the high court's Dukes ruling precludes the bid.

  2. September 10, 2015

    Goldman Calls Addition Of Sex-Bias Intervenors Prejudicial

    Former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. employees suing the company for sex discrimination shouldn't be allowed to add two new representatives to their proposed class action, the company insisted this week, telling a New York federal court the additions were "highly prejudicial."

  3. August 18, 2015

    Goldman Slams Addition Of Intervenors In Sex-Bias Action

    Goldman Sachs Group Inc. asked a New York federal court Monday to reverse an order adding two new named representatives to a suit accusing the company of sex bias that plaintiffs hoped would fix a class certification issue, saying the judge stretched the law to allow their intervention.

  4. August 10, 2015

    Goldman Sachs Must Wait To Depose Sex Bias Intervenors

    A New York federal magistrate shot down a bid by Goldman Sachs & Co. to depose two women the bank says waited too long to intervene as prospective class representatives in a sex bias suit against the bank, saying their declarations are clear about when they became aware of the case.

  5. August 06, 2015

    Goldman Sachs Wants Two Sex-Bias Suit Intervenors Deposed

    Goldman Sachs & Co. asked a New York federal judge for permission to depose two women who intervened in a sex bias suit, but lawyers for the women said that the judge had already considered and rejected the bank's arguments.

  6. July 28, 2015

    Goldman Blasts 'Sideshow' Declarations In Sex Bias Battle

    Goldman Sachs & Co. took aim Tuesday at declarations from women looking to serve as class representatives in a sex bias suit, calling the filings a "sideshow" meant to divert attention from the fact that the women knew about the suit but waited years to try and intervene.   

  7. April 14, 2015

    New Plaintiffs Seek To Take Up Goldman Sex-Bias Case

    A proposed class of former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. associates and executives alleging that a sexualized culture and discriminatory evaluation policies hindered their pay and promotion chances sought to add two named representatives in New York federal court on Monday, hoping to fix a standing issue that had dashed their certification hopes.

  8. March 10, 2015

    Judge Recommends Denying Cert. In Goldman Sex-Bias Suit

    A New York magistrate judge on Tuesday recommended against certifying a class of former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. associates and executives alleging that a sexualized culture and discriminatory evaluation policies hindered their pay and promotion chances, saying the case would require analysis of too many individual decisions.

  9. October 22, 2014

    Goldman Attacks Commonality Of Putative Gender Bias Class

    Goldman Sachs Group Inc. on Wednesday rejected the notion that women claiming a sexualized culture of discrimination damaged their pay and promotion prospects could band together in court, arguing the individual situations of more than 1,000 potential plaintiffs don't share common traits required for class certification.

  10. September 25, 2014

    Ex-Goldman Workers Want Experts Axed In Sex Bias Suit

    Female ex-employees behind a sex bias suit against Goldman Sachs & Co. on Wednesday urged a New York federal court to exclude testimony over compensation and best practices from two of the investment bank's experts, saying the testimony is unreliable and "speculative and troubling."

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!