Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Chen-Oster et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC. et al
Case Number:
1:10-cv-06950
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Cohen & Gresser
- DLA Piper
- Epstein Becker
- Freedman Normand
- Lieff Cabraser
- Orrick Herrington
- Outten & Golden
- Paul Hastings
- Sanford Heisler
- Steptoe LLP
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Willkie Farr
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 07, 2023
Goldman Gets Final Nod For 'Historic' $215M Sex Bias Deal
A Manhattan federal judge on Tuesday gave the final stamp of approval to Goldman Sachs' $215 million gender discrimination settlement with a class of female employees, a deal described by the plaintiffs' counsel as "historic" and "the largest of its kind."
-
October 30, 2023
Goldman Sachs Asks Court To Ignore Objector To $215M Deal
Goldman Sachs has urged a New York federal judge to place the final stamp of approval on a $215 million settlement between the company and female attorneys to end a 13-year-old sex bias lawsuit, saying that a single worker's objection should not doom the deal.
-
July 13, 2023
Goldman Workers Seek $78M Atty Award After Sex Bias Win
Women who secured a $215 million settlement with Goldman Sachs to end a wide-ranging sex bias suit told a New York federal judge that their attorneys deserve more than $78 million in fees and costs, arguing that their historic victory in the 13-year-long litigation justifies the hefty award.
-
May 09, 2023
Goldman Strikes $215M Deal In Long-Running Sex Bias Suit
Goldman Sachs has agreed to pay $215 million to wrap up a more than decade-old sex discrimination class action alleging its review metrics systematically disadvantaged female employees, staving off a trial that had been scheduled to start next month.
-
January 02, 2023
5 Cases Discrimination Lawyers Should Watch In 2023
The U.S. Supreme Court will hand down decisions in closely watched cases on affirmative action in higher education and companies' ability to deny services to LGBTQ customers, plus trial is finally set to begin in a long-running sex bias class action against Goldman Sachs. Here, Law360 examines the battles that discrimination attorneys should have on their radar in the new year.
-
August 23, 2022
Goldman Sachs' Gender Bias Suit Gets Class Restriction
A New York federal judge restricted who can be part of a long-running class action accusing Goldman Sachs of systemic gender bias, ruling that employees must have worked at the financial institution long enough to have gone through a performance review that impacted their pay.
-
April 28, 2022
Women Say Class Must Stay In Goldman Sachs Sex Bias Suit
A group of women suing Goldman Sachs over pay discrimination urged a New York federal court to reject the bank's latest bid to decertify their class, saying that not every purported class member must show she faced harm.
-
April 01, 2022
Goldman Asks Court To Rethink Certifying Gender Bias Class
Investment bank Goldman Sachs has asked a New York federal judge to rethink what it considers a faulty basis for certifying a decade-old gender discrimination class action.
-
March 18, 2022
Goldman Sachs Fails To Disband Sex Bias Class
A New York federal judge rejected Goldman Sachs' bid to decertify a class of female employees behind a long-running sex bias battle against the investment banking company, saying the company was rehashing arguments the court had already heard.
-
September 27, 2021
Goldman's Swipe At Sex Bias Class Falls Short, Women Say
A class of female Goldman Sachs employees behind a long-running sex bias battle against the investment banking company called on a New York federal judge to reject the company's decertification effort, arguing it largely recycles rejected arguments.